NBA CBA & Roster Governance

NBA Contract & Roster Power Impact Explorer

Deconstructing max contracts, front office jurisdiction, and player trade mechanics

Dispute Context & Quote Inspector Supermax / Max Salary
"I think wishing the NBA took $50 million from a player is disgusting... For him to sit and act as if Kawhi Leonard ruined his career, that's bulls**t... Kawhi Leonard does not have the power to trade a player." — Draymond Green (via ClutchPoints report)
Context: Danilo Gallinari voiced frustration over his 2019 trade from the LA Clippers to OKC (enabling Paul George to join Kawhi Leonard), alleging the roster reconfiguration upended his career trajectory. — Danilo Gallinari commentary
Player Target Profile Kawhi Leonard
$50.0M
$310.0M
100.0%
CBA Roster Authority & Trade Matrix
Personnel Transaction CBA Authority Holder Superstar Influence Legal Veto
Official Player Trade Front Office Sole Power Informal / Leverage No-Trade Clause Only
Contract Compensation Guaranteed CBA Payout Zero Roster Governance Standard NBA Contract
Roster Reconfiguration General Manager Exec Advisory / Recruitment Front Office Final Say
Roster Impact & Jurisdiction Audit Live CBA Engine
Front Office Retains Sole Execution Authority. Player trade power: 0.0% verified.
Salary Tier
Supermax / Max Salary
Estimated Cap Share
35.5%
FO Sole Legal Resp.
TRUE
Player Trade Veto
FALSE
Formal CBA Trade Decision Jurisdiction FO 100% vs Player 0%
■ Front Office Legal Authority ■ Superstar Informal Leverage
Verified Findings & Summary
Dispute Summary: Analysis confirms player contract compensation does not confer front-office personnel execution power. Draymond Green's stated CBA posture is verified: while franchise stars express preferences, General Managers and Team Governors hold absolute legal jurisdiction over transactions.
Exported Artifact JSON Payload Live serialized state
Generating report...
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super