NCAA Transfer Window Antitrust Legal Explorer

Deck v. NCAA & SMU: Sherman Act § 1 Legal Precedent & Market Restraint Modeling

Rule of Reason Scrutiny

1. Interactive Transfer Window Regime 30-Day Window (Challenged)

Injunction Probability
88.4%
NIL Liquidity Damage
$1.84M Est.
Antitrust Scrutiny
Rule of Reason
Case Docket Kyla Deck v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n & Southern Methodist Univ.
Relevant Labor Market NCAA Division I Women's Basketball Elite Athletic Services
Sherman Act Section 1 Step-3 Burden Less restrictive alternatives exist: multi-window portal, unrestricted post-academic eligibility.

2. Antitrust Precedent Lineage Click nodes to inspect

2026 Challenge
Deck v. NCAA & SMU

Direct Section 1 challenge to transfer portal calendar window restrictions and related roster caps under Alston Rule of Reason framework.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super