The Quora Question Reconciled
"Is a non-invertible symmetry an oxymoron in mathematics?"
Under the 19th-century definition of symmetry (Felix Klein's Erlangen program & group actions), yes: by definition, every group element has a unique inverse.
However, modern mathematics and quantum physics generalized this: symmetries are characterized by conservation laws and Ward identities arising from topological operators. When operators are allowed to sum into direct sums (vector spaces of defect lines), they form a semisimple tensor category (fusion category) where defects like $D$ lack an inverse yet generate exact selection rules.
Kramers-Wannier Duality ($d_D = \sqrt{2}$)
At the 2D critical Ising temperature, the high-temperature and low-temperature expansions are related by Kramers-Wannier duality. Inserting the defect line $D$ along the spatial circle enacts this duality.
Since $D \otimes D = 1 \oplus \psi$, the Perron-Frobenius eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix satisfies $d_D^2 = 1 + 1 = 2 \implies d_D = \sqrt{2}$. Because the quantum dimension is irrational, $D$ cannot be a conventional unitary symmetry (which must have integer dimension 1).