Super Logo Super Maritime Claims & Evidence Workdesk

Offshore Injury Jurisdiction & Evidence Navigator

Fixed offshore platform incidents differ fundamentally from open-water maritime claims. Evaluate the critical thresholds separating the Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 30104), the Longshore & Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. § 901), and the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) to assemble a verifiable evidentiary dossier.

Incident Parameters

Adjust factors or select presets
10%
Supreme Court Chandris v. Latsis requires substantially ≥ 30% duration in service of a vessel or fleet under common ownership.
Seaman Status (Chandris) ✕ Not Satisfied 10% time on vessel is under the 30% substantial temporal requirement.
Vessel in Navigation ✕ Fixed Artificial Island Fixed rigs permanently anchored into the subsoil do not qualify as maritime vessels.
Compensation Framework ✓ Statutory LHWCA Covers statutory medical care and disability schedule without requiring proof of negligence.

Statutory Legal Framework Comparison

Statutory Regime Negligence Requirement Maintenance & Cure Pain & Suffering Third-Party Suit (§ 933 / Tort)
Jones Act (46 U.S.C. § 30104) Featherweight Negligence standard Yes (Immediate daily living & medical) Recoverable in civil court Available vs. negligent third parties
LHWCA / OCSLA (33 U.S.C. § 901) No-Fault Statutory Scheme No (Statutory disability wage & medical) Barred against direct employer Permitted against platform operator / contractors
State Workers' Comp / Tort No-Fault State System State-regulated disability caps Barred against direct employer Permitted under applicable state tort law

Maritime Evidence & Verification Dossier

3 items logged
Ready to evaluate
Jurisdictional Notice: This analysis implements established maritime choice-of-law principles (including Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347 and Herb's Welding, Inc. v. Gray, 470 U.S. 414). Jurisdictional rulings are fact-intensive and depend on employment contracts, vessel charters, and physical logs. Consult licensed admiralty counsel before making legal filings.

Key Distinctions in Offshore Injury Law

The Fixed Platform vs. Vessel Boundary

Under the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Herb's Welding, Inc. v. Gray, oil and gas exploration from a stationary platform affixed to the subsoil is treated as an extension of an island or land rather than traditional maritime commerce. Workers permanently assigned to fixed platforms generally do not qualify as Jones Act seamen, even if situated hundreds of miles out in the Gulf of Mexico.

The 30% Temporal Rule (Chandris v. Latsis)

To qualify as a seaman entitled to sue an employer under the Jones Act, a worker must have a substantial connection to an identifiable vessel (or fleet of vessels under common ownership) in navigation, both in nature and duration. The Supreme Court recognized a rule of thumb requiring that a maritime worker spend approximately 30% or more of their total working time on a vessel in navigation.

Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA)

The OCSLA (43 U.S.C. § 1331) applies federal maritime law and the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act to stationary installations, drilling rigs, and artificial islands located on the outer continental shelf beyond state territorial water boundaries. It ensures rapid administrative disability compensation while allowing third-party negligence suits under Section 933.

Third-Party Liability Claims (Section 933)

While the LHWCA shields the direct employer from negligence suits through its statutory exclusive-liability protection, injured offshore platform workers frequently have actionable claims against independent platform operators, charterers, equipment manufacturers, or crane contractors whose negligent operations contributed to the incident.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super