Lead sourcing
Pull raw company lists from databases (Apollo, Clay, LinkedIn scrapes) filtered by industry, headcount, geography. Volume is cheap here; relevance is not.
"AI that finds businesses that need it and closes them" sounds like magic. Strip the hype and it's a six-stage pipeline where each stage has a conversion rate — and the whole business lives or dies on multiplication. Learn the anatomy, then run the math yourself.
Pull raw company lists from databases (Apollo, Clay, LinkedIn scrapes) filtered by industry, headcount, geography. Volume is cheap here; relevance is not.
Attach emails, tech stack, hiring signals, funding events. Typically 60–75% of raw leads get a valid, verified email. Bounced emails burn your sending domain — verification is non-negotiable.
Score each lead against your Ideal Customer Profile: right size, right industry, an actual trigger (e.g. "just posted a job for the thing you automate"). A strict filter that keeps 30–40% beats spraying everyone.
An LLM drafts a first line referencing the lead's specific trigger. Good personalized cold email gets 2–8% reply rates; generic blasts get under 1% and get you spam-flagged.
3–5 touches over 2–3 weeks. Roughly half of all replies come from follow-ups, not the first email. Automation shines here: nobody forgets touch #4.
Of replies, only some are positive (~30–40%), and of those, most but not all show up to book (~60–80%). The output metric that matters: cost per booked meeting.
Set the volume and per-stage conversion rates. The 3D funnel narrows to match, and the pipeline math updates live. Drag the funnel to orbit it.
Drag to orbit · each disc's width = leads surviving that stage (log scale)
Worked example (the "Realistic" preset):
| Stage | Rate | Survivors |
|---|---|---|
| Sourced | — | 10,000 |
| Enriched (valid email) | 70% | 7,000 |
| Qualified (ICP fit) | 35% | 2,450 |
| Replied | 4% | 98 |
| Positive reply | 35% | ≈34 |
| Meeting booked | 70% | ≈24 |
At a $1,500/month stack, that's about $63 per booked meeting — genuinely good. Now notice the leverage: doubling reply rate (better personalization) doubles meetings. Doubling raw leads does too, but burns domain reputation and list quality. The rate levers beat the volume lever.
Mailboxes cap safe sending at ~30–50 cold emails/day each, need 2–4 weeks of warm-up, and one bad bounce streak can blacklist a domain. Volume has a hard ceiling per domain — automation doesn't repeal it.
Automation reliably gets you to a booked call. Closing still needs a human (or a very good product-led flow). Funnels that claim "closed deals, zero humans" are usually counting sign-ups, not revenue.
When every vendor uses an LLM for the "I saw you just raised a Series A" line, reply rates fall for everyone. The durable edge is a real trigger signal others don't have — not nicer wording.