⚖️ Probate Dispute Analyzer Cal. Prob. Code §§ 1800.3 / 1801

Legal Standard Balance General & Temporary

Projected Judicial Disposition
Petition Denied
Clear & convincing evidence not established; active alternatives viable.
Autonomy / Dismissal (0%) Threshold (65%) Conservatorship (100%)
Incapacity Elements (§ 1801) Clear & Convincing
Severe Financial Inability
Substantially unable to manage financial resources
Personal Self-Care Failure
Unable to provide food, clothing, shelter, medical
Susceptibility to Undue Influence
Active exploitation or delusion risking asset loss
Statutory Defenses & Alternatives AB 1663 Reform
Less Restrictive Alternatives Viable
SDMA, DPOA, Trust, or voluntary treatment active
Proposed Conservatee Objection
Retains counsel and articulates autonomy plan
Spouse / Interested Party Objection
Conflicting family interests, asserts adequate care
Emergency Standard (§ 2250) Imminent Peril
Immediate & Substantial Harm
Acute unmitigated danger requiring ex parte order
Toggling elements dynamically recalculates probate burden tests and court disposition forecasts.
Petitioner Position (Parent/Kin) Claims Crisis
  • Allegations of chronic substance misuse and intermittent medical relapses.
  • Concerns that quarterly trust distributions will be squandered or exploited.
  • Requests conservatorship of estate and person to control disbursement & treatment.
  • Burden Status: Insufficient evidentiary proof of continuous legal incompetence.
Proposed Conservatee Constitutional Rights
  • Asserts fundamental liberty interest under California Probate Code § 1800.3(b).
  • Currently housed, compliant with voluntary outpatient care, managing daily budget.
  • Opposes loss of civil rights, right to contract, and medical autonomy.
  • Rights Status: Viable autonomy supported by private treatment network.
Spouse / Key Support Direct Objection
  • Claims petitioner bypassed spousal statutory priority and communication.
  • Demonstrates mutual domestic stability and existing medical intervention plan.
  • Proposes independent fiduciary or voluntary trust monitoring if oversight is warranted.
  • Defense Status: Undermines necessity of involuntary court intervention.

Core Legal Principle: Substance Misuse vs. Legal Incapacity

Under California law (including recent probate safeguards enacted in AB 1663), a history of substance struggle, eccentric decision-making, or periodic relapse does not equate to legal incompetence. The court requires clear and convincing evidence that the individual cannot provide for basic physical needs or manage resources, and that no less restrictive alternative exists.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super