Reform the portfolio without gambling on hype.
Compare redesign, expansion, merger, launch, and teach-out choices using workforce evidence, institutional capacity, student protections, and explicit uncertainty.
+$6.2mBase case
$19.4mFacilities and equipment
+420Across 12 programs
18%+7 points
126Teach-out obligations
72/100Range 63–80
Program portfolio matrix
No single score decides a program. Select a row to inspect tradeoffs.
12 programs
| Program | Action | Enrollment | Completion | Relevant work | Vacancies | Cost / grad | Faculty gap | Access | Confidence |
|---|
Institution constraints
Each preset changes capacity and recommended actions.
Skills coverage network
Redesign can add current capability while preserving broad education.
Decision comparison
Cost, outcome, and student risk under low, base, and high demand.
| Strategy | 7-year cost | Employment outcome | Student risk | Confidence |
|---|
Governance and implementation path
Decisions move through validation, protection, pilots, and reassessment.
Board-ready outputs
Export the evidence, assumptions, plan, and audit trail.