Correlation is a chain, not a shortcut.

Test the link not the slogan.

Map how a tactic aimed at one institution could create pressure around a separate grievance. The lab scores the proposed mechanism, then names what still needs evidence.

Define the proposed mechanism

Unsaved

Target

NFL

Who can absorb audience or revenue pressure?

Mechanism

Consumer boycott

How does participation create leverage?

Weakest link

Measurable outcome

55/100 needs evidence

Follow every handoff.

A causal claim is only as strong as its weakest transition.

Three questions before calling it correlation

Did the target have leverage over the grievance?

A boycott can create reputational or financial pressure on its target. The missing step is whether that target can influence relevant decisions, norms, or public attention.

Could attention be separated from impact?

Agenda-setting and direct policy change are different outcomes. Record which one you mean, then choose evidence that can actually observe it.

What result would change your mind?

Name a time window, response, comparison, and counterfactual before interpreting the outcome. Otherwise the claim can absorb every result.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.