Public Event Ethics & Hatch Act Compliance Auditor

Evaluate public appearances, speeches, campaign-adjacent travel, and political endorsements by executive officials against 5 U.S.C. §§ 7321–7326 (Hatch Act), 5 C.F.R. Part 734, DOJ non-interference policies, and federal travel apportionment rules.

CRITICAL STATUTORY VIOLATION RISK Score: 92/100
Hatch Act Liability
High
5 U.S.C. § 7323(a)
DOJ Norms Status
Breached
Election Sensitivity Memo
Mandatory Repayment
$14,200
5 CFR § 734.503 Apportionment
OSC Investigation Risk
Extreme
Office of Special Counsel
ETHICS COMPLIANCE VULNERABILITY RADAR 6 Dimension Risk Assessment
STATUTORY & ETHICAL FINDINGS 6 Rules Evaluated

Required Corrective Actions & Legal Defenses

Statutory Frameworks & Norms Breakdown

The Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 7321–7326)

Enacted in 1939 to prevent federal personnel from coercing voters or using public authority to affect election outcomes. While Tier 1 PAS officers can engage in certain non-official political speech, they may never use official title, government appropriations, staff, or vehicles for political campaign events.

DOJ Non-Interference Policy

Formalized by successive Attorneys General (the "Election Year Memos"), Department of Justice policy strictly prohibits public speeches, investigative disclosures, or public rallies within 60 days of an election that could influence voter sentiment or compromise DOJ neutrality.

Travel Apportionment (5 C.F.R. § 734.503)

When an official travels for mixed official and campaign purposes, federal appropriations law and ethics guidelines mandate that the political campaign or party reimburse the U.S. Treasury for airfare, hotel, and associated costs on a pro-rata or full charter basis.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super