Legal-Technical Litigation Dossier

Seattle Times & Newsday v. OpenAI & Microsoft

Auditing the prayer for Algorithmic Disgorgement (model destruction), training set contamination, and eBay v. MercExchange permanent injunction hurdles across foundation model architectures.

Disgorgement Injunction Likelihood
24.2%
Court ordered total destruction of weights
Retrain Compute Write-Off
$18.5M
~1.2M H100 GPU Hours
Statutory Damages Ceiling
$126.3B
Up to $150k / registered willful work
Expected Settlement Val.
$42.1M
Annualized multi-year archive licensing

eBay v. MercExchange 4-Factor Injunction Test 547 U.S. 388 (2006)

1. Irreparable Harm (Market Substitution & Direct Competition) 85%
LLMs quoting, summarizing, and synthetic search answering bypass publisher paywalls and ad impressions.
2. Inadequacy of Monetary Damages (Ongoing Inability to Calculate Dilution) 68%
Persistent embedded representations inside billions of weights make precise royalty partition challenging.
3. Balance of Hardships (Retrain Write-off vs. Journalistic Insolvency) 28%
Courts hesitate to issue structural death-sentences destroying commercial models worth hundreds of millions.
4. Public Interest (AI Utility vs. Free Press Viability) 55%
Public interest heavily balances preserving independent investigative journalism against AI innovation.

Technical Remedy: Algorithmic Unlearning vs. Model Disgorgement MACHINE UNLEARNING FEASIBILITY

Remedy Mechanism Technical Method Compute Cost Collateral Degradation Litigation Acceptance
Exact Algorithmic Disgorgement Weight zeroing / Full scratch re-train without Seattle Times / Newsday corpus $18.5M Zero (clean slate, but massive write-off) Favored by Plaintiffs (FTC Precedents: Everalbum, Cambridge Analytica)
Influence-Function Pruning Hessian-vector inverse weight modification targeting plaintiff tokens $1.4M ~3.2% general knowledge perplexity degradation Experimental; lacks definitive federal evidentiary validation
Negative Preference Tuning (DPO / RLHF) Targeted unlearning via negative log-likelihood on Seattle Times text $240K Susceptible to jailbreak regurgitation; latent weights preserved Likely rejected as insufficient structural disgorgement
Mandatory Compulsory License Continued deployment paired with court-ordered archive royalty pool Royalty Stream None (weights intact) Common equitable compromise under eBay factor 2

Litigation Claims Profile CAUSE OF ACTION BREAKDOWN

Plaintiffs: The Seattle Times Co., Newsday LLC Defendants: OpenAI Inc., Microsoft Corp. Forum: S.D.N.Y. (Related to NYT v. OpenAI) Prayer for Relief: Destruction of GPT models containing Plaintiffs' works

The lawsuits assert that millions of Pulitzer-prize winning investigative stories were copied without permission to train commercial models (GPT-4, Copilot). Crucially, the complaints allege DMCA §1202(b) violations for stripping Copyright Management Information (author bylines, copyright notices, terms of service) from training corpora to avoid automated infringement tracking.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.