R/MDecision Lab

Reasoning depth workbench

Choose depth by evidence, not instinct.

Match the mode to the task, expose verification debt, and leave with a run brief your team can inspect.

Task assumptions

Describe the decision

Recommended run

Balanced mode

78fit / 100

Dominant risk
Effort
Latency
Review

Why this mode

    Visible tradeoffs

    Compare all three modes

    Illustrative heuristic

    Verification plan

    Checks before trust

      Stop condition

      Inspect the model

      No hidden reasoning required.

      Difficulty combines stakes, ambiguity, decomposition need, and novelty. Deadline, budget, privacy, and verification coverage constrain the recommendation. The lab shows inputs and score contributions, never hidden chain-of-thought.

      View scoring assumptions

      Deep mode gains from difficulty and available verification. Fast mode gains from deadline pressure, low stakes, and clear tasks. Balanced mode handles mixed signals. High stakes with weak verification always adds human review.

      Durable output

      Keep the decision, not just the answer.

      Scenario is ready.

      Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super