Private source diligence

Early alpha deserves better evidence.

Three accounts were named. One claim was cut short. Turn the tip into a review you can inspect, revise, and export before it shapes a decision.

0%reviewed

Three names. Separate evidence.

The source text is preserved as attribution, not proof. Set a status, record what you actually checked, and keep confidence tied to your own evidence.

Move from tip to trace.

A clean review separates what the post said from what you independently observed.

Preserve

Keep the original attribution intact.

The desk carries forward the exact named accounts and the role attached to each. The incomplete third claim remains visibly incomplete.

Verify

Record evidence, not enthusiasm.

Use profile history, timestamps, and primary announcements to write what you checked. Confidence is your assessment, not a live score supplied by this page.

Export

Take the review with you.

Download all statuses, notes, confidence values, claims, and source boundaries as structured JSON that remains useful outside this page.

Own the conclusion.

The board never follows an account, fetches a feed, or invents a market result. It gives you a durable place to decide what has earned attention.

0Reviewed
0Flagged
0Avg confidence
Source defaults loaded

Research aid only. No live feed, automatic follow action, endorsement, or investment advice. Account names and claims come only from the supplied post.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.