Editorial Policy Workbench • WSJ Analysis

SAT Admissions Policy & Education Gap Simulator

Based on reporting by Jason Riley on Notre Dame and top-tier university testing reversions.
Admitted Class Size
3,200
Acceptance Rate 21.3%
Avg Admitted SAT
1,365
Applicant Pool Avg 1,180
Socioeconomic Diversity
72.4
Target Parity: 100 Equitable Spread
Screening Efficiency
88.5
Predictive Validity High Reliability
Applicant vs. Admitted Composite Score Distribution
Comparing total applicant pool distribution against final admitted cohort
Applicant Pool
Admitted Students
Admission Cutoff

Editorial Policy Finding: Balanced screening with objective signal

Reinstating standardized testing anchors admissions decisions in an objective benchmark. This counteracts widespread high school grade inflation while allowing targeted contextual bias correction to identify high-potential low-income candidates who lack polished extracurricular counseling.

Demographic & Income Quintile Breakdown

Admitted Class Representation

How admissions criteria distribute offers across family income levels and school resource brackets under the current policy configuration.

Income Quintile Pool Share Admit Count Admit Share Avg SAT Avg GPA Holistic Advantage
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super