Affordable picks ($15–$25) maximize daily value scores.
Wider ergonomic wings disperse side pressure and eliminate edge digging.
High spandex microfiber blends adapt dynamically across torso movements.
Multi-panel contouring gently anchors tissue without rigid underwires.
Smoothness Index
94 / 100
Ultra-Smooth Profile
Value Assessment
Exceptional Value
High score relative to $18 price point
Estimated Cost / Wear
$0.08 / wear
Over 234 estimated wears

Torso & Back Contour Displacement Simulation

Real-time comparison: Conventional narrow wire band vs. calibrated seamless wireless wing

Narrow Band Ridge
Smooth Wireless Contour

Annualized Cost

$12.00 / yr

Spread over standard garment rotation cycle.

Pressure Relief Index

91%

Dispersed band force vs. concentrated underwire points.

Longevity Factor

High (Elastane 82%)

Resistant to band roll-up and shape loss.

Fitting Insight: Shoppers prioritize wide-wing wireless styles because standard narrow bands (under 4.5 cm) create localized pressure peaks up to 3.2× higher, inducing the common “bra bulge” along the thoracic rim. Expanding the back band to 6.5 cm with an 82% elastic recovery redistributes friction evenly beneath fitted tops and T-shirts.
Fit Summary Card exported successfully!

Garment scores and an assumed cost-per-wear denominator

Read the explanation

Default band six point five centimeters times three gives nineteen point five, elasticity eighty-two times point forty-five gives thirty-six point nine and smoothing eight times four point seven gives thirty-seven point six. Their sum ninety-four is rounded and clamped between twenty and one hundred. Bars compare ninety-four with ceiling one hundred at five pixels per point. The score is authored arithmetic, not a measured fit, actual garment pressure or medical comfort assessment. The source approximates each month as four point three three three three weeks. Three wears weekly times eighteen months rounds to two hundred thirty-four. Stored eighteen-dollar price divided by that count rounds to eight cents per wear. Bars use separate labeled scales, two pixels per wear and one thousand pixels per per-wear dollar. It assumes the garment survives and is worn that often; actual durability, usage and value are not measured. The relief expression adds band-width fraction times forty-five, smoothing times five point two and six. Default six point five and eight give seventy-six point eight five, rounded to seventy-seven and capped at ninety-nine. Bars compare calculated score and cap at five pixels per point. This percentage is a source label, not measured pressure reduction or clinical evidence. Native everyday preset, complete stable JSON fit card and reset preserve source dimensions and drawing; actual fit, garment claims and physical outcomes remain unverified.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super