⚖️

Speech Liberty & Harm Balance Lab

⚙️ Scenario Setup

Democratic Truth Value 0.95
Incitement Risk 0.15
Group Dignity Harm 0.10
Public Disruption / Offense 0.20
💡 Drag sliders or vectors on canvas to stress-test ethical models. Real-time thresholds indicate shifting regulatory permissibility.
2D Ethical Boundary Tension Radar Political Opposition Pamphlet
Current Vector
Mill Boundary
Feinberg Boundary
Waldron Boundary
Dominant Ethical Conflict
Minimal tension; core political speech protected across all major frameworks.
Consensus Index
4 / 4 Protected
Harm Principle
John Stuart Mill
Protected
Speech restricted only to prevent direct, imminent physical harm or clear incitement.
Threshold Trigger: Incitement > 0.65
Offense Principle
Joel Feinberg
Protected
Extends regulation to severe public nuisance, involuntary exposure, and extreme offense.
Threshold Trigger: Public Disruption > 0.70
Dignity & Hate Speech
Jeremy Waldron
Protected
Focuses on safeguarding public social standing, civic dignity, and equal group assurance.
Threshold Trigger: Dignity Harm > 0.50
Democratic Self-Governance
Alexander Meiklejohn
Protected
Absolute protection for political discourse necessary for informed democratic citizenship.
Threshold Trigger: Truth Value < 0.10