Cap the address. Not the belief.

Put the visible rules under exact arithmetic. A wallet cap does not identify a holder, and a raise threshold does not prove demand.

Proposed allocation

WALLET CAP2%
BUY FEE1%
PRESALE THRESHOLD45 SOL

No wallet connection, launch transaction, bonding-curve equation, market price, gas quote, sell tax, migration target, demand forecast, or investment conclusion is included.

AWAITING INPUTEXACT DECIMAL ARITHMETIC
MAXIMUM TOKENS PER WALLET ADDRESS

2% of total supply.

MINIMUM WALLETS FOR OFFER
EQUAL SHARE / EXPECTED WALLET
GROSS CONTRIBUTION
STATED 1% BUY FEE
PROGRESS TO 45 SOL

Run the representative case.

Three numbers. Four cautions.

A cap limits one address. A wallet is not a person. A fee is cash flow, not value. A threshold is a condition, not conviction.

Minimum address count

Divide offered allocation by the address cap and round up. This is a mathematical floor, not a forecast of unique holders.

Presale arithmetic

Expected wallets times contribution gives gross SOL. Compare that with 45 SOL without inventing price or demand.

Evidence boundary

Real diligence still needs contract code, legal terms, beneficial ownership, liquidity, custody, security, and deployment evidence.

COMPLETED ALLOCATION ENVELOPE
ADDRESS CAP
No calculation completed.
Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.