Trial Evidentiary Matrix • Case Analysis

Trial Evidence Verification Workbench

Matter: State of Nevada v. Duane 'Keffe D' Davis
Legal Issue: Direct Shooter Liability vs. Accomplice / Co-Conspirator

1. Evidentiary Weight & Corroboration Matrix Interactive Testimony

Adjust corroboration scores, challenge witness concessions, and observe live updates to legal sufficiency standards.

E1: Detective Clifford Mogg Cross-Examination Concession Direct Physical Act: Unverified
Lead detective affirmed law enforcement could not independently verify defendant fired the weapon or defendant's exact physical actions inside vehicle during shooting.
E2: Scene Forensics & Ballistics Recovery Physical Forensics
Four occupants in white Cadillac; recovered .40 caliber shell casings at Flamingo/Koval match Glock trajectory, establishing firearm conveyance into rear seat.
E3: Extrajudicial Admissions & 2019 Memoir Admission / Intent Disputed
Recorded public interviews and book statements detailing vehicle presence during drive-by encounter; defense asserts commercial embellishment.

Legal Standard & Jury Instruction Model

Under Nevada statutory law (NRS 195.020), every person concerned in the commission of a felony, whether directly committing the act or aiding and abetting, is a principal.
Evidentiary Gap Diagnostic: Unverified Physical Trigger Pull vs Documented Vehicle Presence

2. Dynamic Proof Threshold & Verdict Confidence

Overall Corroboration Confidence: 48.5%
0% (Speculative) 50% (Preponderance) 85% (Reasonable Doubt) 100%
Direct Shooter Charge
Insufficient Direct Corroboration
Detective concedes lack of verification of defendant firing.
Accomplice / Aiding & Abetting
Triable Factual Dispute for Jury
Forensics + memoirs support co-conspirator presence.

3. Evidentiary Relationship Network D3 Interactive Topology

• Green: Corroborated • Red: Uncorroborated / Disputed • Drag nodes to rearrange
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super