Wearable AI Privacy & Bystander Risk Auditor
Simulate bystander optical capture cones, acoustic pickup distances, and indicator perceptibility against the EU AI Act, GDPR Biometrics (Art. 9), and US Wiretap statutes before hardware release.
Bystander Capture Cone & Optical Telemetry
HIGH BYSTANDER RISKThe "Pervert Glasses" Backlash Curve
Since Google Glass (2013) to Meta Ray-Bans and AI pendants, wearable hardware fails consumer adoption when bystanders feel unconsented surveillance. Passive LEDs often provide false security: in direct sun, a 10 mcd diode is invisible past 2 meters.
Statutory Reality vs Marketing Claims
Companies attempt to reframe ambient capture devices as "personal AI assistants." However, courtroom precedents treat hardware that records continuous public audio or extracts facial geometry as illegal wiretapping and unlawful biometric capture.
Engineering Privacy by Design (PbD)
True compliance demands tamper-proof LED kill switches (preventing tape masking), hardware shutter clicks for snapshot capture, localized on-chip edge inference with zero raw cloud video retention, and automatic bystander face blurring.