Wholesale DvP Settlement Lab

Inspired by ECB Pontes & RTGS DLT Bridges

Model Delivery versus Payment (DvP) settlement workflows for tokenized sovereign and supranational debt. Compare Gross RTGS, Net Batching, and Liquidity-Saving Synchronization bridging wholesale central bank reserves with tokenized asset ledgers.

Settlement Execution & Reserve Telemetry

Cycle: #1 Initialized
Settled Notional
€0M
0% of total queue
Peak Reserve Drag
€0M
0% of available buffer
Liquidity Efficiency
0.0x
Notional / Cash ratio
Gridlock Fails
0
Unsettled or delayed

Intraday Reserve Consumption & Cumulative Clearance

Available Reserves
Locked Liquidity
Cleared Volume

DvP Order Book & Settlement Log

10 orders in pipeline
Trade ID Security ISIN Counterparties (Buy → Sell) Notional (€) Effective Cash Leg Status
System ready. Select a model or press Execute Clearing Run. ISO 20022 / Pontes Protocol Ready
All simulations evaluate atomic cash leg netting vs. real-time gross collateral lockups.

Wholesale DvP with Pontes

When central banks like the European Central Bank connect distributed ledger technology (DLT) securities platforms to RTGS systems (like TARGET Services), they avoid retail CBDC complications. Instead, wholesale cash legs are settled directly against high-value tokenized debt instruments atomically.

Gross RTGS vs. Netting Engines

Pure RTGS DvP (Model 1) requires pre-funding every single trade dollar-for-dollar, generating substantial intraday reserve drag. Liquidity Saving Mechanisms (LSM) and batch netting (Model 2/3) unlock offsetting obligations, reducing reserve requirements by 40% to 75%.

Collateral Haircuts & Solvency

Sovereign tokenized debt incorporates risk-calibrated haircuts. In fractional or synchronized bridges, participating banks post central bank reserves or pre-authorized repo credit lines to guarantee that delivery failures never propagate through systemic interbank corridors.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super