The Acemoglu Economic Framework & Debates Explorer Nobel 2024

Stress-testing institutional IVs, task automation dynamics, and AI macroeconomic productivity bounds

Econometric Parameters

Exclusion Violation (γ Direct Disease Effect): 0.12
γ = 0 assumes strict exogeneity (pure AJR); γ > 0 captures Sachs/Albouy malaria confounders.
Settler Mortality Measurement Noise (σ_e): 0.15
Baseline Sample Constraint: All Former Colonies
Benchmark Presets:

Econometric Simulation & Peer Critique Evaluation

2SLS Inst. Coeff (β̂) 0.68
IV vs OLS Gap (Δ) 0.24
Task Displacement Index 1.65
10-Yr AI GDP Boost (%) 0.88%
Wage Inequality Δ +8.4%
Structural Regression & Sensitivity Spectrum 2SLS Instrumental Variable Shift
Empirical Resilience Assessment: Albouy & Sachs Sensitivity

Under mild exclusion restriction violations (γ=0.12), the estimated institutional coefficient remains positive but drops from 0.92 to 0.68. The causal premium over OLS contracts by 35%, confirming Albouy's warning regarding campaign mortality measurement noise.

Model Vector Estimated Parameter 95% Confidence Interval Critique Resilience Status
AJR 2SLS Institutions (β̂) 0.680 [0.42, 0.94] Moderate Sensitivity
Labor Share Delta -1.85% -- Capital Deepening Bias
AI TFP Macro Growth Ceiling 0.088% / yr [0.05%, 0.12%] Acemoglu Bound Validated
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super