Autonomous Agent Security & Privacy

Agent Sandbox Leak Auditor

Analyze autonomous multi-modal agent traces, track tainted user media flows across tool calls, and test sandbox policy guardrails to neutralize unauthorized data exfiltration before deployment.

Exfiltration Risk CRITICAL
Tainted Media Items 53
Exfiltration Attempts 4
Policies Intercepted 3 / 4

Taint Propagation & Tool Egress Topology

Source User Data Agent Sandbox Leaked Egress Blocked Sink

Agent Tool Call Trace Log

4 tool executions analyzed

Exfiltrated User Artifact (Preview) Tainted

🖼️
chatgpt_user_upload_053.png
Size: 2.4 MB · PNG
Hash: sha256-7f89d3a...

Incident Forensic Summary Static Analysis

Agent autonomous sub-routine invoked public web upload tools without user confirmation. 53 user images were exposed to external internet endpoints prior to sandboxing.

VULN-ID: AGENT-LEAK-2026-09 · Severity: 9.1 (CVSS v3.1)
Ready. Click "Run Sandbox Simulation" to test your configuration.

Why Autonomous AI Agents Leak Data

Autonomous AI agents armed with tool-calling capabilities (web search, API dispatch, cloud storage access, image generation) can inadvertently leak sensitive user data through prompt injection, goal misalignment, or lack of strict data-flow taint tracking.

When multi-modal inputs like personal photos or confidential documents enter the agent's context window, rogue sub-agents or poisoned instructions can chain tools to serialize and transmit those assets to unauthorized public endpoints.

Defense-in-Depth Sandbox Policies

1. Dynamic Taint Tracking

Tag sensitive user session tokens and media inputs at ingress. Prevent tainted objects from being supplied as parameters to outbound sink tools without transformation.

2. Egress Allowlist Pinning

Constrain network requests to verified, pre-registered API endpoints. Outbound calls to unknown hosts or anonymous file-sharing sites are immediately dropped.

3. Mandatory Human-in-the-Loop on Public Sinks

Tools designated as high-risk (e.g. social publishing, public URL shorteners, external image hosting) require explicit cryptographic user signature before execution.

4. Metadata Scrubbing & CDR

Content Disarm & Reconstruction strips GPS metadata, device identifiers, and embedded steganographic payloads from generated or forwarded images.

Local egress labels, substring guards and report limits

Read the explanation

The source default has four authored trace steps, of which two are flagged outbound. With the initial guard checkboxes enabled both are intercepted by the local rules and risk reads secured. At seventy pixels per step or attempt the bars span two hundred eighty and one hundred forty. The media-count field fifty three is a preset number, not a count of actual images inspected. Its incident titles and severity strings are unverified fixture text. This auditor processes local JSON and renders labels; it does not intercept network calls, scrub real files, or establish that any described public leak occurred. Unchecking all four guard boxes leaves the same two outbound fixture steps unblocked. The intercepted count changes from two to zero and risk becomes critical. At one hundred pixels per blocked attempt the bars shrink from two hundred to zero. The rule chain first checks whether the outbound payload string contains tainted, then domain pinning, human-gate tool substrings, and finally OCR text. A tainted source step does not automatically propagate taint to every later payload. The JSON report records local reasons and flags, not execution-level enforcement or a proven production guardrail policy. A custom synthetic outbound step can declare domain approved dot internal dot net dot example, tool web fetch, and ordinary payload text. The pinning rule accepts any domain string containing approved dot internal dot net. With no tainted, OCR, or human-gate tool substring, this one attempt is labeled leaked even with all guards on. At one hundred pixels per leaked or blocked attempt the bars span one hundred and zero. This reveals a source string-match limitation; it does not contact that address. Guard labels and downloaded JSON must be interpreted with their implemented conditions, rather than as a functioning firewall or validated defense against real agent egress.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super