Geopolitics SIM AI Frontier Velocity

AI Geopolitical Pace & Safety Simulator

“The Republicans fear slowing down AI development could give China the edge.” — The Verge (@verge)

Explore the high-stakes policy frontier: evaluate how domestic safety certification constraints, advanced semiconductor export controls, and sovereign R&D subsidies balance catastrophic frontier failure risks against international capability parity.

Policy Levers LIVE COMPUTE
Preset Scenarios:
55%
Pre-deployment audits, catastrophic alignment checks, red-teaming mandates.
70%
Advanced HBM & GPU foundry lithography restrictions on external competitors.
60%
Federal energy interconnection, supercomputing clusters, national AI lab funding.
30%
Bilateral compute verification treaties and autonomous proliferation bans.
Active Compute & Alignment Dynamics SIMULATING
US FRONTIER LABS CHINA DOMESTIC ECOSYSTEM
36-MONTH VELOCITY TRAJECTORY US: 74.2 vs CN: 71.8
Geopolitical Edge
US Lead (+2.4)
Calculated differential in frontier frontier capabilities
Catastrophic Risk Probability
14.5%
Alignment breakout & uncontrollable deployment risk
US AI Velocity Score
74.2
Algorithmic progress per month adjusted for compliance friction
China AI Velocity Score
71.8
Indigenous compute ramp throttled by Western export limits

Policy Synthesis & Strategic Posture

Economic Growth Index: 88.3 / 100
Strategic Position: US Advantage

Under current parameters, the US maintains an operational technological lead of 2.4 velocity points. High export controls (70%) suppress non-allied frontier hardware replication, while balanced internal safety regulations keep catastrophic failure exposure capped at 14.5%.

Verified JSON Telemetry Handoff
{}
Clicking “Export Telemetry” captures a timestamped policy brief JSON containing exact mathematical weights, velocity vectors, and risk thresholds.

Geopolitical AI Velocity and Risk Tradeoffs

Read the explanation

This simulator models how national safety regulations, compute export controls, and research subsidies jointly dictate international artificial intelligence capability leads and catastrophic risk. In the baseline preset, safety regulation sits at 55 percent, producing a US velocity score of 74.2 against China's 71.8 and limiting catastrophic breakout risk to 14.5 percent. Selecting Unrestricted Acceleration drops safety regulation to 15 percent and boosts subsidies to 90 percent. This widens the technological edge, but accelerates catastrophic risk upward to nearly 27 percent. Users can drag individual policy levers, observe live particle simulation bottlenecks, and click Export Telemetry to extract verified mathematical decision weights for policy briefings.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.