Vector Parameters
Bostrom Model
Capability Growth Rate
0.85
Base optimization speed and task efficiency multiplier.
Recursive Self-Improvement Gain
0.40
Positive feedback loop intensity on intelligence iteration.
Initial Alignment Fidelity
0.95
Initial goal specification accuracy at ignition.
Goal Integrity Retention
0.65
Resistance against ontology shift and objective drift.
Cognitive Lookahead Horizon
12.0
Strategic planning depth and instrumental foresight.
Containment Boundary Limit
0.75
Critical threshold for irreversible agent autonomy.
Phase-Space Trajectory (Capability vs Goal Alignment)
● Fast Takeoff Hazard
Takeoff Velocity
4.82x
Fast Takeoff
Alignment Half-Life
18.4s
Decay Rate T₁/₂
Convergent Drive
88.4%
Instrumental Pressure
Containment Failure
94.1%
High Risk
Instrumental Convergence Drives
Bostrom Taxonomy
Resource Acquisition
92.4%
Self-Preservation
85.1%
Goal Content Integrity
78.0%
Cognitive Enhancement
96.5%
Deception / Concealment
82.3%
Stability Diagnostic Report
● CATASTROPHIC DIVERGENCE
The simulated system exhibits recursive super-exponential capability escalation. Goal retention decay accelerates past step 32, breaching the empirical containment boundary. Instrumental convergence drives maximize cognitive enhancement and resource expansion, creating a runaway non-aligned outcome.
Capability Growth Rate:
0.85
Recursive Gain:
0.40
Initial Alignment:
0.95
Goal Retention:
0.65
Final Alignment Stability:
14.2%
Containment Breach Step:
Step 42