LEGIS

Crypto Legislation Impact & Provision Explorer

Statutory analysis sandbox modeling the CLARITY Act jurisdiction split & compliance friction

Total Provisions
4
Analyzed statutory sections
Avg Compliance Friction
67.25/100
Regulatory friction weighting
Legislative Viability
Moderate Risk
High Amendment Probability
Lead Jurisdiction Split
CFTC 2 · FED 1 · SEC 1
Primary agency allocations
Bill Section Inspector

Select any statutory section to review its jurisdictional designation and amend compliance friction parameters:

Provision Amendment Sandbox
sec_def_01
74
Higher friction indicates complex registration, attestation, or cross-agency burdens.
Oversight & Friction Matrix
Interactive coordinate mapping: Agency Jurisdictions vs. Compliance Friction
CFTC SEC Fed/OCC
Primary Statutory Regulatory Split
CFTC (Commodities)
2
Federal Reserve / OCC
1
SEC (Securities / ATS)
1

Congressional Research & Market Structure Assessment

Under the baseline CLARITY Act proposal, the bill tilts jurisdiction toward the CFTC (2 provisions) for digital commodities and decentralized protocols, while assigning payment stablecoin reserve supervision to banking regulators (Federal Reserve & OCC) and secondary platform registration to the SEC. An average friction score of 67.25 creates substantial friction in DeFi and custody attestations, signaling high probability of committee amendments before floor consideration.

Report generated successfully
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super