Crypto Policy Impact Analyzer

Decompose aggregate cryptocurrency market shifts following regulatory votes, executive orders, and legislative defeats (such as the CLARITY Act) into macro market beta versus policy-specific excess relief.

Event Presets:
Gross Market Cap Shift +$210.0B +8.57% total
Macro Beta Contribution +$99.2B 47.2% systemic
Regulatory Policy Alpha +$110.8B 52.8% pure shock
Abnormal Return (CAR) +4.52% t-stat: 3.42 (p < 0.01)
Capital Attribution & Event Trajectory (T-3 to T+14 Days)
Decomposes counterfactual benchmark baseline from policy-driven net inflow.
Counterfactual Base
Macro Equity Beta
Policy Relief Alpha
Event Horizon Scrubber: Day T+7
Sector Disaggregation & Relief Absorption Attributed Inflows
Digital Asset Sector Est. Pre-Cap Macro Beta Flow Policy Alpha Flow Net Sector Inflow Total Return
Ready: Quantitative attribution model calibrated to post-CLARITY Act failure dataset.

Methodology: Policy Shock Event Studies

When sweeping digital asset legislation (such as restrictive market-structure acts) fails in committee or congress, asset valuations surge due to removed compliance overhang. However, raw headline market cap claims (+ $210B) conflate broader economic liquidity with legislative relief.

This model uses a counterfactual Single-Index Model (SIM):
R_crypto(t) = α_policy + β_macro * R_macro(t) + ε(t)
By disentangling the systemic component (β * ΔMacro * MCap), analysts can isolate the genuine abnormal surplus directly generated by the regulatory clearance.

Why Sector Breakdown Matters

Regulatory bills rarely affect all tokens equally. Securities-clarity laws disproportionately burden high-velocity DeFi governance protocols and staking tokens, while Bitcoin and Ethereum frequently trade on commodity/ETF liquidity.

Adjusting sector elasticity weights reveals whether the +$210B rally is broad-based speculative expansion or acute regulatory relief concentrated in decentralized infrastructure.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super