Legislative Package Preset
Donald Trump Executive Signal Veto Threat

Models the executive pressure dynamic highlighted by Rep. Ritchie Torres: opposition by Donald Trump exerts a chilling effect on Republican moderates and forces partisan polarization.

Compromise & Scope Levers
SEC vs CFTC Boundary Balanced
CFTC PrimarySEC Dominant
DeFi & Non-Custodial Safe Harbors Broad
Strict AML/BSABroad Safe Harbor
National Security & OFAC Tools Robust
Light TouchStrict Treasury Oversight
Caucus Whip Alignment
House Problem Solvers (Bipartisan) 68% Yes
Progressive Caucus (Dem) 15% Yes
Freedom Caucus (Rep) 30% Yes
Status: Baseline loaded. 435 members calculated.
Failed on Floor
198 - 237
Short by 20 votes
Dem Yes (74) Rep Yes (124) Undecided (12) Total No (225)
U.S. House Hemicycle Floor Seating (435 Representatives) Simulated Roll Call Pattern

“Were it not for Donald Trump, we likely could have seen both Democrats and Republicans get to yes.”

— Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY), speaking on the CLARITY Act and crypto market structure negotiations
Caucus & Faction Whip Analysis
Caucus / Faction Party Total Seats Estimated Ayes Estimated Nays Support % Key Sensitivity

The Torres Executive Wedge Thesis

When a former or sitting president threatens a veto or signals opposition, swing members facing primary challenges withdraw support. In crypto market structure, Ritchie Torres observed that bipartisan negotiations were close to clearing the 218-vote threshold until executive pressure unified faction opposition.

Statutory Balancing: CFTC vs SEC vs OFAC

Mainstream Democrats demand robust Treasury/OFAC anti-money laundering enforcement and narrow safe harbors. Conservative Republicans resist broad SEC disclosures. Reaching 218 requires threading this needle without triggering a faction boycott.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super