Turnover Leverage Analysis

Goal-Line Turnover Swing Lab

Simulate goal-line snaps, tackle collisions, and loose-ball scrambles. Quantify the brutal expected points destruction (EPA) and win-probability collapse when an offense coughs up the ball on 1st & Goal.

2D Red Zone Tactical Pitch

1ST & GOAL AT MIN 3 • TIED 0-0
INSIDE ZONE • SWIFT DIVE
READY AT LINE OF SCRIMMAGE
Pre-Snap EP +5.42 pts Historic 1st & G expected score
EPA Turnover Swing -6.28 pts Value vaporized on fumble
Offensive Win Prob 68.2% → 46.1% -22.1% net delta
Sim Strip Risk 38.4% Calculated tackle force index
Pre-snap read: Offense lined up in shotgun with D'Andre Swift flanking. Defense shows an aggressive 8-man goal-line blitz box. Click Snap & Run Play to simulate contact physics.
Ready to simulate snap. Adjust gap leverage or ball extension above.

The Brutal Economics of 1st & Goal Turnovers

In standard NFL expected points models (like those from nflfastR and Brian Burke's pioneer research), having 1st & Goal inside the 5-yard line is worth between +5.2 and +5.9 Expected Points (EP). Offenses convert this field position into touchdowns over 72% of the time.

When a ball carrier fumbles and the opponent recovers in the end zone or inside the 5, the defending team immediately assumes possession worth approximately -0.6 to -1.1 EP to the original offense. This produces an immediate net EPA swing of -5.8 to -7.0 points on a single snap—statistically equivalent to conceding a defensive touchdown.

Down & Distance Avg Pre-Play EP TD Probability EPA of Lost Fumble
1st & Goal at 1 +5.88 pts 84.2% -6.72 pts
1st & Goal at 3 (Swift) +5.42 pts 76.5% -6.28 pts
1st & Goal at 5 +4.95 pts 67.1% -5.75 pts
1st & 10 at Own 20 +0.41 pts 21.8% -3.80 pts

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did D'Andre Swift fumble against the Vikings?

On goal-line inside handoffs, defensive linemen shoot interior A/B gaps. When contact occurs while the back is still accelerating forward and fighting for the goal line, defensive line helmet impact or punch attempts dislodge the football before the carrier can secure it with both arms.

How does Win Probability (WP) swing differ in Q2 vs Q4?

A goal-line turnover in Q2 with 1:45 left deprives the offense of a high-confidence score and flips momentum, causing a ~20% to 25% WP drop. In the 4th quarter with under 3 minutes remaining in a one-score game, the same goal-line turnover drops offensive win probability by upwards of 45% to 65%.

Can this tool evaluate other goal-line play types?

Yes. You can switch between Inside Zone, Power Lead ISO, Toss Sweep, and Play-Action passes across any yard line between the 1 and 8 to evaluate how penetration and ball security alter strip probability and outcome distribution.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super