The Economist / 1843 Deep Dive Grounding

India Exam Funnel & Aspirant Life-Cost Simulator

Quantifying the structural recruitment bottleneck standing between millions of educated Indian youths and scarce public sector jobs (such as Railway Ticket Collectors & Group D posts), tracking foregone lifetime wages, multi-year retry sinks, and policy reform levers.

Acceptance Rate
0.28%
1 in 357 candidates
Total Economic Sunk Cost
₹12.75 Lakh Cr
Preparation + Foregone Wages
Candidate-Years Invested
42.50M yrs
Avg 3.4 yrs in coaching hubs
System Disruption Drag
+14.2 Mos
Leaks, Stays & Re-exams
Exam Pipeline Setup
Applicant Pool 12,500,000
Vacancies Advertised 35,000
Annual Living & Coaching Cost ₹1,20,000
Foregone Entry Private Wage / Yr ₹1,80,000
Avg Prep & Retry Cycles 3.4 yrs
Systemic Disruptions
Paper Leak & Exam Cancellation Risk
High Court Litigation Stays
Unannounced Hiring Freezes
Stage-by-Stage Attrition Funnel Log-Proportional Attrition Model
Structural Reform Simulation Workbench Policy Counterfactuals
Eliminates multi-year notification backlogs; reduces avg retry cycle by 0.9 yrs.
Zeroes out leak cancellation odds and cuts procedural court delays by 80%.
Increases local entry salaries; diverts ~35% of marginal repeat test-takers.
Compresses Mains to Appointment window from 18 months down to 4 months.
Active Reform Dividend: Select reform levers above to evaluate national savings in candidate-years and economic productivity.
Context: Model parameterized against recruitment cycles documented in The Economist and 1843 investigations (e.g., RRB Non-Technical Popular Categories CEN 01/2019 exam: 12.5M applicants for 35,281 vacancies). Opportunity cost computed as sum of annualized direct living & coaching hub expenses plus foregone entry formal wages over average aspirant preparation duration.
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super