⚖️ Criminal Trial Insanity Defense & Evidence Framework Map

Interactive Legal Analysis Workbench for Mental State Defenses in Criminal Court
Evidentiary Network Map
Defense Prosecution Legal Criteria
Statutory Standard Evaluation MA / Model Penal Code
ALI / Model Penal Code Standard: A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality [wrongfulness] of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law.
BURDEN OF PROOF REQUIREMENT
Defense must establish insanity by affirmative preponderance of evidence
EVIDENTIARY BALANCE SCORE
0.52 Defense Leaning
Cognitive Prong: Appreciating Wrongfulness
Substantial impairment in capacity to appreciate wrongfulness demonstrated
Volitional Prong: Conforming Conduct to Law
Inability to conform conduct to requirements of law contested
Trial Case Claims & Intent Matrix
Defense Affirmative Claims:
  • Severe post-partum depression with psychosis
  • Inability to appreciate the wrongfulness of conduct
  • Involuntary lack of substantial capacity to conform conduct to law
Prosecution Rebuttal Claims:
  • Calculated premeditation and flight / concealment steps
  • Understanding of moral and legal wrongfulness during act
  • Conscious awareness demonstrated through search history and timing
Completed Framework Summary

Under the ALI / Model Penal Code Test, the defense meets the cognitive threshold based on expert psychiatric findings, while prosecution digital forensics challenge the volitional limb.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super