Financial Inputs & Allocation
Financial Results
Product Category Subsidy Breakdown
Pro-rata inventory split across 1,200k units| Category | Avg MSRP | Discounted Price | Per Unit Relief | Units Share | Tariff Subsidy | Total Savings |
|---|
| Category | Avg MSRP | Discounted Price | Per Unit Relief | Units Share | Tariff Subsidy | Total Savings |
|---|
The saved scenario starts with forty-five million assumed litigation pool. Seventy-eight point five percent recovery yields thirty-five point three two five million. Allocating thirty-nine percent gives thirteen point seven seven six seven five million sale funding. Bars share zero at fifteen pixels per million dollars. Actual litigation, refund amounts and corporate policies are unverified assumptions. One point two million assumed units times average fifty-nine ninety-nine yields seventy-one point nine eight eight million retail value. Thirty percent discount gives twenty-one point five nine six four million savings. Bars compare savings and allocated funding at twenty pixels per million. The gap is not automatically a real loss; it is the source accounting scenario. Subtract modeled funding from consumer savings to get seven point eight one nine six five million merchant absorption, rounded to seven point eight two. Bars compare total savings and this gap at twenty pixels per million. The source rounds individual exported results, so reported sums can differ in cents of a million. Full native JSON and reset remain unchanged. Economic validity, current events and other controls remain unverified.