Plaintiff Case Intake & Demand Studio

Evaluate tort viability, index medical treatment chronologies, model contingency fee economics, and draft policy-limit tender demand packages for personal injury practice.

Total Specials
$0
Medical + Lost Wages
Evaluated Claim Value
$0
Specials x Multiplier
Recommended Demand
$0
Tender Policy Limit
Est. Net to Client
$0
After Fees, Liens & Costs

Disbursement Waterfall at Full Policy Tender $100,000

Client Net: $45,817
Firm Contingency Fee: $33,333
Medical Liens / Subro: $18,400
Litigation Costs: $2,450

Intake Viability Assessment

High Viability (A-Rating)

Clear liability with police citation. Total damages exceed defendant's $100,000 policy limit, creating strong bad-faith exposure if insurer rejects prompt tender.

Insurer Bad-Faith Leverage
Demand constitutes a timed policy-limit tender. If rejected, insurer risks exposing their insured to personal excess verdict liability.
Expected Firm Realization
Estimated legal fee of $33,333 on $2,450 advanced costs yields a 13.6x capital multiplier on pre-litigation resolution.
● Case calculations synchronized with local client record.

1. The Shift to Algorithmic Intake

Modern plaintiffs firms use AI-assisted triage to filter low-liability or capped cases early, calculating net client recovery after healthcare liens to avoid unrecoverable cost outlays.

2. Policy-Limit Tender Strategy

When verified medical specials and non-economic harm exceed coverage limits, drafting a disciplined time-limited demand triggers statutory bad-faith penalties if the carrier refuses settlement.

3. Lien & Subrogation Precision

A $100,000 gross settlement is ineffective if hospital or Medicare liens consume $60,000. Real-time disbursement waterfalls protect the plaintiff's net recovery and ensure ethical representation.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super