Institutional Levers
Parametric Model
72%
Social media scrub depth, forensic compliance, disqualification bar.
65%
HQ media approval control vs. candidate rogue speech autonomy.
60%
Strict manifesto adherence vs. local faction doctrinal leeway.
58%
Permanent regional offices vs. virtual volunteer campaigning.
450
42,000
Shock Event Testing
Candidate Screening Funnel
143 Approved Candidates
SELECTION STAGE
RETAINED POOL
ATTRITION
1. Grassroots Pool
—
2. Digital & Social Scrub
-144
3. Policy Compliance
-92
4. Branch Ratification
-43
5. Approved Ballot Slate
Final
Disqualification Diagnostics
Social Media & Historical Rhetoric
108 rejected
Manifesto & Orthodoxy Heresy
65 rejected
Branch Factional Infighting
43 rejected
Compliance & Financial Checks
36 rejected
Strategic Audit Log
[SYSTEM] Initialized default state: Centralized Vetting Overhaul.
[METRIC] Scandal hazard reduced to 12.8% via intensive screening depth.
[TRADEOFF] Grassroots retention suppressed to 54.2% due to disqualification friction.
Institutional Balance Sheet
Projected Outcomes
Parliamentary Viability
74.1
Scandal Hazard Risk
12.8%
Voter Appeal Broadening
68.4%
Ground Coverage
61.5%
Grassroots Retention
54.2%
Export Strategy Summary
Ready for export. Adjust parameters or select shock tests to recompute the strategic balance sheet.