Point Deduction -38 pts Commission Sporting Penalty
Charges Sustained 79 / 115 Breaches Proven on Majority
Financial Fine £42.5M Cost Order & League Penalty
Expulsion Threat HIGH Rule W.51.4 Triggered
Breakdown of sustained violations versus dismissed or time-barred claims based on current evidentiary threshold:
Commission Precedent Analysis:

Under the appeal rulings in Premier League v Everton FC (2024) and Premier League v Nottingham Forest (2024), structured guidelines impose a 3-point base for a threshold breach plus 1 point per £5M of quantified excess. Charges involving deliberate misstatement or concealed sponsorship payments trigger uncapped discretionary powers under Rule W.51, extending to title expungement and automatic relegation.

Understanding the Premier League 115 Charges & Tribunal Sanction Process

1. The 5 Indictment Pillars

The charges span 2009–10 through 2017–18 regarding financial disclosure, disguised owner equity as commercial sponsorship, secret manager/player remuneration, UEFA Club Licensing, and failure to cooperate with league investigators from 2018 through 2023.

2. Standard of Proof

Unlike criminal trials (beyond reasonable doubt), independent sports tribunals use the civil standard: the balance of probabilities. However, English arbitration law requires heightened cogency of evidence before finding bad-faith dishonesty by club executives.

3. Sanction Range Under Rule W.51

The three-person independent panel holds unlimited sentencing power: uncapped financial fines, registered player contract bans, suspended points, immediate record sporting deductions (surpassing Portsmouth's 9 points or Everton's 10-point initial sanction), or outright expulsion.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super