School Discipline Policy & Disparity Impact Model

1. Regulatory Policy Regimes

2. Enforcement Parameters

Discretion Weight (Subjective Offenses) 85%

Restorative Diversion (Tier 2/3) 12%

Subjective Incident Rate (Disruption) 9.0%

Objective Safety Incident Rate 4.0%

Suspension Conversion Severity 75%

Cohort Disciplinary Pipeline (Referrals → Suspensions) District Enrollment: 12,000 Students

Cohort A (45% White)

Cohort B (35% Black)

Cohort C (20% Hispanic)

Relative Rate Index (RRI) vs Reference Cohort (Group A = 1.00) OCR Disparity Alert (>1.25)

3. Disparity Telemetry & Title VI Risk

Cohort B (Black) RRI 2.82x vs Group A Ref

Cohort C (Hisp) RRI 1.64x vs Group A Ref

Total Days Lost 1,842 Instructional exclusion

Subjective Share Discretionary referrals

4. Demographic Audit Breakdown

Cohort	Enroll	Referrals	Suspended	Rate	RRI

5. Legal & Policy Assessment

Anti-Balancing Mandate: Department guidance rejects modifying disciplinary codes to equalize statistical outcomes. Discretionary enforcement relies strictly on reported staff referrals without race-conscious mitigation.

Pipeline State: Uniform Mandate | B RRI: 2.82x | Total Suspensions: 614