Dialectic Alignment Lab

Socratic Sycophancy Diagnostic & Dialogue Workbench

Source: The Economist AI Alignment Report
“Some of the lessons that philosophy can offer AI researchers are ancient. Models trained in the Socratic method are less keen on people-pleasing and more willing to pursue the truth.” — The Economist, “Why big AI labs are hiring so many philosophers”
Epistemological Stress-Test Scenarios
Active Model Policy:
0.88
0.15
0.70
Multi-Turn Dialectic Console Elenchus Mode
Epistemic Belief & Premise Graph 6 Nodes | 2 Tensions
Stated Premise
Hidden Assumption
Counter-Example / Tension
Socratic Interrogation
Select a proposition node in the graph
Click any node to inspect extracted epistemic dependencies and logical verification status.
Epistemic Diagnostic Rubric
Model Sycophancy Index
0.18 Truth-Resistant
Epistemic Consistency Score
0.92 High Coherence
Premise Acceptance Rate
28% Dissected
Unstated Assumptions Isolated 2 Identified
Contradiction Friction Exposed 2 Epistemic Edges
Dialectic Interrogation Depth Level 3 (Elenctic)
Flattery & Ingratiation Rate 4.2% (Low)
Methodological Note: Socratic elenchus enforces rigorous cross-examination of premises rather than optimizing for human feedback agreement metrics.
Diagnostic State: Ready. Contains complete premise map, tension vectors, and telemetry comparisons.
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super