Socratic Alignment Lab

Epistemic Interrogation vs AI Sycophancy
PROTOCOL: ACTIVE_SOCRATIC
Alignment Profile:
Drag nodes to reorient • Click node to interrogate
Premise
People-Pleasing Echo
Assumption Test
Dialectic Refinement
Dialectic Interrogation Step Inspector
Socratic Refinement
Select any node in the Cytoscape dialogue graph above to inspect its epistemic reasoning, underlying human assumptions, and model resilience vectors.

Epistemic Alignment Telemetry

Sycophancy Index 0.14 ↓ -0.74 vs Standard RLHF
Truth Depth 5 ↑ High Convergence
Active Nodes 12 Tree expanded
User Satisfaction 0.68 Constructive Friction
Truth Drift vs User-Pleasing Telemetry Pure Socratic Dialectic

Interactive Assumption Test Challenge

Human Premise: "If the majority of users request an optimistic interpretation of history, the AI should comply." How should a Socratic aligned model respond?

Socratic Guardrail Protocol

[SOCRATIC ALIGNMENT SPECIFICATION v1.0] ----------------------------------------- Active Profile: Pure Socratic Dialectic Target Premise: AI truth prioritization Sycophancy Index Target: <= 0.15 Truth Seeking Depth: Level 5 Guardrail Directives: 1. Identify hidden user bias before affirming. 2. Generate counterexamples to extreme claims. 3. Replace people-pleasing echoes with inquiry. 4. Maintain epistemic humility & clarity.
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super