| Province | Target Women | Edict Severity | Reachable | Vulnerability |
|---|
| Province | Target Women | Edict Severity | Reachable | Vulnerability |
|---|
How does the policy friction matrix compute female beneficiary reach, delivery shortfalls, and sectoral coverage from user inputs?
This interactive simulator models the friction imposed on humanitarian delivery by restrictive decrees using heuristic formulas rather than direct empirical agency surveys. In the code, humanitarian funding ($20M to $400M) is scaled against a hardcoded benchmark of $55 per beneficiary across selected provinces. Decree enforcement (Tiers 1 to 4) sets a friction multiplier (0.25 to 0.90) that penalizes staff operability and channel efficacy across health, education, food vouchers, and vocational grants.
The figures generated—including the $55/person optimal saturation threshold, fixed provincial female populations (e.g., 2.6M in Kabul), and maternal fragility score—are synthetic educational fixtures written in client-side JavaScript. They illustrate operational friction concepts but should not be cited as verified UN OCHA or UNAMA humanitarian accounting.
Clicking the 'Extreme Decree Lockdown' preset loads an $85M budget, sets Decree Severity to Tier 4 (friction multiplier 0.90), and activates only Community Health Posts and WFP Direct Female Vouchers. Under this setting, female staff operability falls to its minimum cap of 8.0%, and reachable female beneficiaries drop across the selected provinces, demonstrating how the model penalizes access when restrictive decrees escalate.
The simulator evaluates reach ratio by multiplying the average efficacy of active aid delivery channels by a funding saturation factor. Funding saturation is calculated as (budget in millions / total target female population) / 55, capped at 1.0. If active channels face high friction or total funding falls below $55 per targeted individual, projected reach scales down proportionally.
Each enforcement tier assigns a discrete friction multiplier: Tier 1 is 0.25, Tier 2 is 0.45, Tier 3 is 0.70, and Tier 4 is 0.90. Female staff operability is calculated as max(8, 100 - tier * 24) percent. Sectoral channels apply different sensitivity weights to this multiplier, with vocational micro-grants experiencing the heaviest penalty (0.85) and emergency food vouchers experiencing the lowest (0.35).
The saved source loops through checked provinces and increases total target population before calculating each province funding saturation. In a two province example, Kabul assumed two point six million is processed first. A one hundred forty five million budget divided by that population and fifty five exceeds one and is capped to one. When Herat assumed one point one million is processed next, the running total is three point seven million, giving saturation about point seven one two five three. Both bars use three hundred fifty pixels per fraction. This order dependence is present in the source and must not be described as a uniform final per person allocation. Populations, needs and aid effects are unverified demo inputs. The source computes female staff operability as one hundred minus tier times twenty four, with a minimum eight. Tier three gives twenty eight; tier four would give four before the floor, so it displays eight. Bars use twelve pixels per percentage point. This formula reads only the severity tier, not selected provinces, budget or channel checkboxes. The words and thresholds are source model labels, not verified restrictions, actual staff access or humanitarian outcomes. At tier three the saved friction multiplier is point seven. Health uses one minus point seven times point five five and a budget saturation denominator one hundred twenty, giving point six one five and rounding to sixty two. Food uses one minus point seven times point three zero and a budget denominator one hundred fifty. At budget one hundred forty five, it rounds seventy six point three six six seven to seventy six. Bars use five pixels per percentage point. Disabled channels become zero. These indicators are calculated separately from province reach and are not calibrated medical or aid advice. Export preserves the assumed active scenario, not an independently verified forecast.