Maritime Chokepoint & Reroute Risk Analyzer

Evaluate geopolitical threats across critical maritime choke points (Bab el-Mandeb, Hormuz, Malacca). Model voyage rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope, bunker fuel deltas, carbon emissions, and war-risk premiums.

Corridor Trajectory & Chokepoint Map

Interactive Global Nautical Projection & Active Conflict Radius
⚠ High Threat Zone: Active
Bab el-Mandeb Strait of Hormuz Suez Cape of Good Hope Malacca LAT 12.58° N, LON 43.33° E | Red Sea Chokepoint
🚨 Conflict Alert: Red Sea
US military options considered regarding Houthi anti-ship missile & drone strikes. Commercial vessels diverting south around Africa.
Standard Route (via Suez / Bab el-Mandeb)
Diversion Route (via Cape of Good Hope)
High Risk Maritime Zone
Transit Time (Suez vs Cape)
24.5 → 36.8 d
+12.3 Days (+50.2%)
Bunker Fuel Consumption
1,820 → 2,740 MT
+920 Metric Tons
Voyage Cost Delta
+$684,500
Fuel + Canal vs Cape
War Risk Premium (Direct)
$975,000
Avoided if Diverting Cape
Routing Strategy Distance (NM) Days @ Speed Fuel Burn (MT) CO₂ Emissions Canal Fee War Risk Surcharge Net Voyage Cost Status
Simulation ready. Active scenario: Red Sea / Bab el-Mandeb reroute model.

Strategic Context: Red Sea & Global Trade Lanes

The Bab el-Mandeb strait connects the Gulf of Aden to the Red Sea and Suez Canal, handling roughly 12% of global seaborne trade and 30% of container traffic. When armed conflicts or military strikes occur in or adjacent to Yemen, missile and drone threats against commercial vessels force shipping liners to evaluate the trade-off between paying exorbitant war risk insurance rates or incurring a 10 to 14-day detour around the Cape of Good Hope.

This engine quantifies the naval routing decision by combining hydrodynamic speed-power laws (fuel consumption scaling as the cube of speed), bunker pricing, canal toll avoidance, insurance underwriters' Hull & Machinery (H&M) war risk quotes, and fleet capacity absorption.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the Cape of Good Hope fuel and time delta calculated?

Direct passage from Shanghai to Rotterdam via Suez spans approximately 10,500 nautical miles, compared to 14,300 nautical miles via the Cape of Good Hope (an additional ~3,800 NM). At typical cruising speeds of 15.5 knots, this adds approximately 10 to 13 sailing days each way, inflating voyage fuel requirements by 800 to 1,200 metric tons depending on vessel displacement.

What is War Risk Insurance and why does it spike?

War risk insurance is typically quoted as a percentage of the vessel's insured hull value for a 7-day transit window through Joint War Committee (JWC) listed areas. During heightened strikes or US/coalition retaliatory military operations, premiums can jump from 0.05% to over 1.0% of ship value. For a $130M container vessel, a 0.75% premium equals $975,000 for a single passage, rendering the Suez Canal route more expensive than sailing 3,800 NM around Africa.

How does this affect supply chains and container freight rates?

Diverting ships around Africa absorbs 6% to 9% of global container ship capacity because vessels remain at sea longer. The resulting shortage of ship arrivals in Europe and North America triggers equipment imbalances, port congestion, and spot rate spikes (e.g. SCFI, FBX indexes).

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super